ICYMI: The Single Best Predictor of a Successful Meeting is…

In Case You Missed It: This article is from our January 2000 edition of our newsletter “Free-Range Thinking.” It’s a sneak peak at techniques for crafting an effective meeting agenda. If you enjoy this article, you’ll love our workshop Meetings for People Who Hate Meetings. The next class starts on Oct. 11th. Join us!

Man screams at computer

Photo by Andrea Piacquadio

A well-crafted agenda can be the difference between a meandering, frustrating, time-wasting conversation and a genuinely productive meeting. And when you consider how much time you spend in meetings…

“He came to the meeting with an agenda.”

On paper this reads like a simple declarative sentence, but try this test: say it to a colleague and ask what it means. Respondents in my informal focus group were unanimously suspicious: the guy was clearly coming to the meeting with an undeclared purpose. There was something he wanted, so he had an agenda. I wanted only to convey that he was carrying a particular document, but the A-word carries its own baggage these days, and that’s worth noting.

Even though business experts agree an agenda is a critical component of any meeting, I am constantly surprised how many meetings proceed without one. Maybe the word’s negative connotations are partly to blame. Or perhaps some people assume an agenda is merely a list of topics, so they figure there’s no reason passing one around if the list is short (as it frequently is) and everyone knows it anyway. And let’s not discount the factor that explains about 90% of organizational problems: sloth. Whatever the reason, the message here is simple: get over it. “A written agenda, distributed in advance, is the single best predictor of a successful meeting,” says the 3M Marketing Team, authors of the book, Mastering Meetings, and I’ve seen no evidence to the contrary.

The next time you’re invited to a meeting, insist on an agenda. (It’s a fair trade: someone is requesting a portion of your time, so why not ask for a slice of his – prior to the meeting — in return?) And when it’s your turn to call a meeting, make sure your agenda includes the following items:

1. A clear and concise statement of the meeting’s objective.
If you can’t state the purpose and desired outcome in a single sentence, you’re not ready to call a meeting. “The purpose of this meeting is to determine an approach for our new website.” Good: your participants know why they’re convening and what you intend to decide.

Man sitting before clock

Photo by Oladimeji Ajegbile

2. Starting and ending times.
Let attendees know exactly how much time you’re requesting. Everyone announces start times – that’s the easy part – but including an end time gives yourself a deadline and helps your invitees plan the rest of their day.

3. The names of the meeting convener and all participants.
Have you ever attended a meeting where, once the objective was made clear, it was embarrassingly evident that key people were absent? An agenda that includes the objective and a full list of invited participants and that is distributed in advance helps avoid this awkward, time-wasting problem.

4. List of topics, how the group will handle each topic, and anticipated length for each topic.
Most meeting leaders have no problem listing the appropriate topics. For the sample objective noted above, the list might look like this:
A. Different Models of Websites (e.g., content, community, activism)
B. Competitive Profile – What Are Similar Organizations Doing?
C. Financial / Staffing Considerations
D. Brainstorming Ideas
E. Next Steps

What’s not evident here, however, is the kind of interaction planned for each topic. For most meetings, interaction among the leader and participants tends to fall into 3 distinct categories:

Information – a one-way download that doesn’t require feedback (e.g., a manager bringing new information to her team)
Discussion – a solicitation of ideas and suggestions that is not intended to culminate with a decision (e.g., brainstorming)
Action – making a decision or committing to a plan (e.g., next steps)

Discussion at a meeting

Photo by fauxels

Designating item A above as “Information” alerts participants that this portion of the meeting will be a presentation requiring listening only. Adding “Discussion” to item B signals that comments will be requested (so come prepared). Finally, noting the anticipated time length for each item lets participants know what to expect and helps them see in advance what is being prioritized (since more important items tend to be allotted more time).

5. Speakers for each topic.
“Oh, I didn’t know I was supposed to talk about this.” Have you ever heard that in a meeting? Identifying individuals who will lead the various segments in your meeting avoids this problem and helps ensure key participants will adequately prepare.

6. Instructions on how to prepare, what to bring.
If there’s research your invitees need to complete or materials they need to bring (e.g., memoranda, legal pads, doughnuts), your agenda can cover this ground as well. Those who run the best meetings leave nothing to chance, and item #6 is a good catch-all for preparatory steps not covered by #1-5.

When your agenda is completed, circulate it to all invitees a few days prior to the meeting and solicit feedback. You may discover that someone who should be invited has been omitted, an item you thought would only take ten minutes will probably require thirty, or a particular invitee doesn’t have the background materials that are required reading prior to the meeting. By collecting everyone’s feedback, you can improve the agenda and expect more buy-in from your participants.

Toy car on top of road map

Photo by Mihis Alex

An agenda is much more than a list. Thoughtfully prepared, it is a road map that will get you where you want to go and will use everyone’s time more efficiently in the process. “He came to the meeting with an agenda?” Good for him!

BEYOND THE AGENDA
According to a study conducted by the Annenberg School of Communications at the University of Southern California, there are 6 reasons why most meetings fail. The absence of a written agenda is one of them. Here are the other five:
1. Lack of sufficient notification (i.e., no time to prepare).
2. Wrong people in attendance.
3. Lack of control – attendees had no real impact on decision-making process, or the leader didn’t exert proper control of the meeting (or both).
4. Political pressure – attendees were forced to express views which they didn’t endorse (or were reluctant to speak candidly).
5. Hidden agendas.

If you want to improve the quality of meetings you attend, consider investing a few hours learning how to create the conditions for success while avoiding common pitfalls. “Dramatically Better Meetings” is a half-day workshop specifically designed for public interest groups, foundations, or progressive businesses that want to get more from their meetings internally and externally. To find out more, please read the brochure enclosed with this newsletter.

Brilliant Ideas to Build a Storytelling Culture for Fundraising

As the Executive Director of Pinky Swear Foundation, Erica Neubert Campbell knows one of her main roles is fundraising, but she doesn’t consider herself to be a fundraiser. Instead, she is Pinky Swear’s “Storyteller in Chief.” Erica has found that telling stories and developing a storytelling culture at the foundation has been the best way to build relationships, spark interest and solidify commitment with potential supporters.

A man in a peach flowered shirt sits on the left of a woman with short white hair. They hold a picture of their son wearing a red shirt and baseball hat. Over the picture they hook pinkies.The first story you are likely to hear about Pinky Swear, is their origin story: 9-year-old Mitch overhears a family talking about not being able to afford Christmas presents. Mitch decides to empty his bank account and share all he has with the families who are in the cancer ward at the hospital where he is receiving treatment for bone cancer. Mitch asks his father to ‘pinky swear’ to do the same the next year, after Mitch is gone. You can see the story here – bring tissues.

Building on a beautiful foundational story, Erica and her amazing team knew they could reach the hearts and minds of donors, volunteers, staff, and community members by improving their own abilities to share powerful stories. Here are two brilliant ways they have done just that:

Story at staff meetings

an overhead view of 4 people sitting at a table having an office meetingAt least once a month at staff meetings, the Pinky Swear team does an exercise led by All-Star Engagement Manager, Sue Ratcliff. Sue’s role at Pinky Swear is to connect with families who are battling cancer (who they call “All Stars”). For the team exercise, Sue will share information from an interview with a family, write up a story version, and then each staff member will practice sharing the story. They don’t read it word for word. Instead, they practice telling it in their own words; how they might share it with a potential donor or supporter. This way the story won’t feel like a canned speech but will come from the heart.

Erica says having every member of the staff practice storytelling is a huge part of their culture of philanthropy. “Whether you are an office assistant, accountant, or lead fundraiser, you have an important part to play in fundraising and philanthropy.” Story practice enables every member of the staff to communicate what they do through a story of impact.

The story tour

Sometimes donors and potential donors come by the office at Pinky Swear for a meeting or tour. They want to see what the foundation is all about, but they have a rather small office filled with cubicles. How could this inspire donors?

Lacey Kraft, Vice President of Philanthropy, came up with a game-changing way to give an office tour. She envisioned story stations that were set up strategically to create a flow through their office. By the time you finish the tour, you understand the Pinky Swear Foundation mission and are enamored with not just what they do, but how they do it.

A used pair of yellow rain boots is displayed on a black shelfI got to take an abbreviated version of the tour via Zoom. Erica started by bringing me to “Mitch’s Corner.” This is a collection of Mitch’s memorabilia, like his yellow rain boots, a fireman’s hat and Wheaties box. There is a story about each item.

Next to Mitch’s Corner, a small pink leotard lays over the back of a kid’s chair next to a picture of Victoria. Victoria’s mom got a phone call about her daughter’s cancer diagnosis right after a dance class. So, they rushed to the hospital with Victoria still wearing her blush pink leotard.

When a donor interacts with each object, the story of these kids and their families become visceral and emotional. When I saw the mud that is still on the bottoms of Mitch’s yellow rain boots, right away I imagined him splashing and laughing in the rain. I felt connected to him.

Across the office is another station where they put together their Orange Envelope program. This program is often the first connection they make with a family battling childhood cancer. The staff stuff these envelopes with gift cards for immediate needs, a guide to resources and words of support. Right next to the big orange envelopes is a photo of James, so whoever is giving the tour can connect the impact of this program through James’s story.

A mustard colored wall is decorated with 20 pictures of adorable smiling kids.The tour isn’t over yet! There is a wall of pictures of several kids the foundation has worked with. The tour guide can ask which picture speaks to you, and then they can tell the story of that kid and their family: who they are, what their goals and dreams are and how Pinky Swear is supporting them every step of the way.

The Pinky Swear Foundation has been very strategic and purposeful about putting storytelling to work. When asked why that is, Erica makes it sound like a no-brainer. “We realized that’s where we get the most traction. People come and they are genuinely moved.” Erica sheepishly admitted she doesn’t always add a financial ask to the end of the story. Oftentimes, she doesn’t need to. After taking the tour and hearing the stories, people reach out to her to find out more about how they can support the work.

The Pinky Swear team has also found that the families they have served value their stories being seen and heard. They love telling their stories and see that as a way to support the organization that supported them during a difficult time.

If you want your organization to become a storytelling culture, borrow these great ideas from Erica and her team: tell stories at staff meetings and make them part of your office tour. I promise, you will create lasting connections with your supporters. In fact, I pinky swear.

Five Faves from frank

The frank conference, convened each February at the University of Florida and curated by the Center for Public Interest Communications, is always an extraordinary gathering of artists, activists, academics, and changemakers from around the world. This year’s 10th edition, unified by the theme “The Long View,” was no exception. If you couldn’t attend in person or join online, your second chance has just arrived: videos of all the mainstage speakers have been posted on the web, and you can find them here.

In the less-is-more spirit of TED conferences, all the talks are relatively short (generally running between 10-15 minutes), and all 30+ recordings are worth watching. If that feels overwhelming, we recommend starting with the following five presentations that do what frank does best: entertain, inform, and inspire you to follow the frank credo, “Don’t settle for small change.”

“How To Be an Abolitionist,” by Tanya Watkins

Tanya Watkins is the Executive Director of Southsiders Organized for Unity and Liberation, better known as SOUL. (Full disclosure: having seen Tanya speak before, we recommended her for this year’s frank, so we were already fans.) Tanya self-identifies as a “prison abolitionist,” and in this talk she tells you what it means to be an active part of that movement, and why her encounter with the legendary activist Dr. Angela Davis changed her understanding of how we get justice in America.

“The Great Stewardess Rebellion,” by Nell McShane Wulfhart

If you wanted to be a stewardess in the 1960s, you had to be young, pretty, trim, and single. And should any of those things change, you could be fired faster than you could say, “Buh-bye!” None of that would be accepted today, but remember this was the heyday of high-flying Mad Men and a low point for the rights of working women. In this talk based on her book, “The Great Stewardess Rebellion,” Nell McShane Wulfhart tells the under-appreciated story of how airline stewardesses led a worker’s revolution that changed labor laws and advanced the rights of working women everywhere.

“Mind Your Metrics,” by Dessa

Squinting at spreadsheets. Pouring handmade lipstick into tubes. Negotiating over the price of trailers. This is the life of a musician? It has been for Dessa, a supremely talented singer and writer who, like so many others trying to make it in today’s music business, must do everything by herself. For Dessa, metrics such as the number of likes on her Instagram account or the amount of t-shirts sold – things that have nothing to do with being an artist – they not only measure what she does, they start to define it. And it’s not a definition she can accept. Business guru Peter Drucker famously said you can only manage what you can measure. Dessa asks us to consider the opposite: is what you are measuring managing you?

“The Playbook,” by Jennifer Jacquet

In real life Jennifer Jacquet is a Visiting Professor at the University of Miami and an Associate Professor at New York University. For the purposes of her satirical talk at frank, however, she pretended to be a representative of J.J. & Friends, a PR firm that works with corporations whose toxic products are killing people and/or the planet and helps them sow doubt, distract, and outright lie about the damage they are doing. In laying out strategies from the same, playbook that has already served tobacco, oil, and chemical companies so well, Jennifer helps us understand what we can do to fight the lies and disinformation being circulated today.

“Turn Your Rage Into Inspiration” by Rick Serdiuk

Rick Serdiuk is the Creative Director of the Ukraine-based ad agency Banda. The day that Rick spoke at frank was just short of the first anniversary of the Russian invasion, an event that has gradually receded from the consciousness of most Americans, but, as Rick reminded us, remains a defining moment for Ukrainians. In this powerful and moving talk, Rick helped us understand how the Ukrainian people are essentially wheat farmers who, as he put it, are occasionally forced to become falcons who must fight to protect their very identity. He shared some of the creative campaigns his agency launched to keep morale high during the war (most notably the “Be Brave” campaign which circulated worldwide), and by the end of his talk, Rick made sure we understood why Ukrainians proudly call their homeland “the f*** around and find out country of Eastern Europe.”

Stories in the Wild: Dramatic Narrative at Work in Public Interest

In our last newsletter, we requested examples from you of how you are using dramatic narrative to engage your audience and further your mission. The Goodman Center works with organizations across all kinds of issues and geography, and this month, we are featuring the interactive digital storytelling project “Neighbors, Not Strangers,” from the Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., or CLINIC.

Since 1988, CLINIC has been providing training and support to charitable immigration law offices as well as specialized direct legal representation and advocacy for immigration policy at the federal, state and local levels. Communications Project Manager Kathleen Kollman Birch and her team began “Neighbors, Not Strangers” in order to “help shift the narrative” around immigration, and they are off to a great start. (Scroll down to read the whole story.)

Before releasing the first stories, CLINIC kicked off the project with some connecting narrative moments to draw in their audience. Connecting narrative moments are story snippets, like this:

Maria opened the envelope and gazed at the letter inside, her eyes blurry with tears. After 15 years of waiting, it was finally here: the green card that would allow her to visit her ailing mother in Mexico and provide for her three children here in the U.S.

Immediately, we are drawn into the moment with Maria. There are sensory details that create a scene, instead a summary of facts. In just two sentences, we know who the story is about (Maria), what she wants (to care and provide for her family) and we are emotionally connected to her. This is what dramatic narrative is all about, because if you don’t care, you don’t do.

“Neighbors, Not Strangers” released their first full story in January of this year, and a second in March. I’d like to share a couple excerpts from those stories and break down what is working so well about them- what The Goodman Center calls “The Seven Distinguishing Qualities of Dramatic Narrative.”

The first excerpt is from the story, “In the Name of Compassion: The Journey of Aden Batar.” Batar is the director of migration and refugee services at a CLINIC affiliate organization, where he has worked for more than 25 years. His story begins in Somalia in March of 1992, but this section picks up in Nairobi, Kenya in May of 1992.

Aden and his cousin stood at the airport, squinting in the glaring afternoon sun as they gazed at the horizon. The little plane carrying Aden’s wife and son should be arriving any moment.

Aden’s heart was pounding, his breathing shallow. What if something had happened? What if the pilot hadn’t been able to locate his family at the airport in Mogadishu? What if soldiers had stopped them on the road? It was such a precarious plan, the details communicated to his wife via a shaky military radio current. Anything could go wrong.

Kollman Birch, who wrote this story through interviews with Batar, has exemplified several of our seven distinguishing qualities:

  • We feel like we are inside the scene. We can picture the airport through the glaring sun, and we are even brought right into Batar’s thoughts and feelings.
  • Readers experience the action as if in real time. We are waiting for the little plane, moment to moment with Batar.
  • We must stay until the end. Batar’s heart is pounding and ours start to do so as well. “Anything could go wrong,” and we must keep reading to find out if his wife and son arrive safely.
  • Good stories engage our emotions. When we hear, in our minds, his shallow breathing and the anxious thoughts swirling in his mind, our emotions are engaged. We find ourselves caring for this man and his family.

The second excerpt is from “A Dream Uncaged: Part One,” another story written by Kollman Birch with beautiful art by Michelle Garcia. This is a story about Jessica, a teenager from a close-knit family who leaves her home in Nicaragua to seek asylum with her father.

“I’ll see you soon, Mami. Right?” [Jessica*] whispered.

“Yes, mi amor,” her mother answered, stroking her hair. “Soon. Now you must go with your father to catch the bus. I’ll say goodbye to abuela for you.”

Angélica kissed Jessica’s cheek and let go. A few minutes later Jessica and Daniel left the house. Jessica stole a look back at the house where she had grown up. No lights illuminated the windows.

They moved through the dark streets of their town in an eerie silence.

Let’s break down why this is so effective:

  • Characters speak to each other like real people. Instead of using journalistic quotes, there is dialogue: Jessica and her mom are talking to each other. Whenever there is a quote in a story told in dramatic narrative, as a writer, you must ask “to whom are they speaking?” What I see, all too often, is that people in the stories are speaking to the journalist or through the journalist to the audience instead of to another person inside the story.
  • Good stories are concise but vivid. This true moment is so full of emotion, thoughts and feelings and facts that could have been shared. Instead, Kollman Birch has carefully chosen what is essential to paint the picture. She does not need to say how much Jessica and her mom love each other, we experience it through the stoking of Jessica’s hair, through a look that Jessica steals back at her home. We get a sense of the danger by the darkness of the windows and the eerie silence.
  • Stories = scenes (or scenes + summary). This is about showing instead of telling. This story could be written, “Jessica and her father left in the middle of the night. They said goodbye to Jessica’s mother.” These are the facts of the story, but they don’t create pictures in your mind. That is what scenes do so well.
  • We must stay until the end. In journalistic storytelling, all the important facts, including the ending, are given up front. That’s great for times when informing your audience is your goal. In dramatic narrative, you never want to give away the ending. This kind of storytelling makes the audience want to stay and read more. Jessica’s accomplishes this on two levels. First, the story is full of dramatic tension. Second, CLINIC has only released Part One of this story. In order to find out what happens to Jessica and her family, the audience has to be on the lookout for Part Two- or, even better, subscribe to the newsletter!

“Neighbors, Not Strangers” is an excellent example of storytelling in action. At The Goodman Center, we will keep collecting and sharing real-world examples of dramatic narrative at work, so that we can all learn from each other how to move from believing in the power of story, to wielding that power.

*Names of all characters have been changed to protect privacy.

Be the next organization featured in our newsletter and on the Do Good Better Blog. Where and when are you telling stories and how is it going? We want to collect and share examples of stories from your websites, your annual reports- even anecdotes about a story you shared with a donor or volunteer that worked (or didn’t)!
We want to feature your stories and your work so that we can learn from each other and ensure you have the tools to grow your storytelling. Please send your story to kirsten@thegoodmancenter.com

Why We Win Hearts and Minds (Not Minds and Hearts)

In this month of hearts, it seems fitting to focus on the role emotions play in connecting your audience to your cause. How can your comms efforts have the power to compel action? How can you get your audience to donate, to volunteer, to vote – even just to pay attention? How do you win hearts and minds?

Let’s take a moment to consider that phrase itself. There is good reason it is “hearts and minds” and not “minds and hearts.” The pervasive attitude since Descartes famously coined, “I think therefore I am” has been that humans are rational beings who have feelings, but experts like neuroscientist Antonio Dimasio and anthropologist George E Marcus have been making claims that turn Descartes on its head.

Marcus, in his paper The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics claims that reason itself relies upon emotion to determine what to respond to, what is central and vital to us and to initiate and manage action. Or as one of my favorite experts, Andy Goodman, always says “If you don’t care, you don’t do.”

In public interest communications, we have to win their hearts in order to access their minds and help them make the decision to sign up or show up. We need to give them all the feels.

Science backs me up on this, too. In their paper Emotion and Decision Making, Jennifer S. Lerner, Ye Li, Piercarlo Valdesolo, and Karim S. Kassam state that “The research reveals that emotions constitute potent, pervasive, predictable… drivers of decision making.”

If you want your outreach to be potent, pervasive, and persuasive, you are in the realm of storytelling. Neuroscientist Paul Zak has shown in his lab that storytelling has the power to release oxytocin in the brain of the listener or watcher. Oxytocin is a hormone which plays a key role in human bonding.

Zak goes further to call oxytocin the “moral molecule.” “My lab pioneered the behavioral study of oxytocin and has proven that when the brain synthesizes oxytocin, people are more trustworthy, generous, charitable, and compassionate.”

You already know this, because you have experienced it. Stories in the form of films, tv, a loved one’s anecdote or bedtime story have elicited your joy, hope, compassion and more. I think we are sold on story.

Here’s a warning though: the word “story” is bandied about. “Tell your brand story.” “What’s your website’s color story?” “Your data tells a story.” These are not the stories that Zak and I are talking about. You need to be telling stories where real people experience real things and are changed. This is dramatic narrative.

So, if you want to capture those hearts and minds and spur some action, tell your audience the stories of what you do and how you do it. And if you want to know more about how to do that… well, my friend, you are in the right place.

ICYMI: Ads So Bad They Can Actually Do Some Good

In Case You Missed It: This article is from our December 2017 edition of our newsletter “Free-Range Thinking.” The lessons learned about how to avoid bad ads still ring true. Stay tuned to the end for a 2023 update.

Within the past few weeks, America’s largest tobacco companies have started running television and print advertisements explicitly detailing the dangers of smoking. The ads were produced in response to a federal court order, but it took eleven years of wrangling before all sides could agree on the exact wording of these “corrective statements.” The full-page print ads and TV commercials that were finally delivered may meet the specifications of the court order, but they are terrible advertising by any standard.

As Yankee legend Yogi Berra once said, “It’s déjà vu all over again.” In the late 1990s, Philip Morris produced a “Youth Smoking Prevention” campaign that included a series of print ads targeting parents of teenagers. The ads are a master class in what not to do if you want to engage readers and change behavior. So this month we’ve invited an advertising expert to revisit those ads and red-pencil all the wrong choices that went into them. It’s our hope that identifying these errors – some obvious, some less so – can help you avoid similar missteps as you design marketing materials of your own.

Libby Morse

Libby Morse is Senior VP and Creative Director for Lipman Hearne, a branding and communications strategy firm that works with nonprofits, foundations, colleges and universities. For more than two decades, Morse has overseen brand development and hundreds of campaigns at Lipman Hearne, and prior to that she helped develop TV, radio and print campaigns at DDB Needham Worldwide.

Before evaluating the Philip Morris ads, Morse insisted on one caveat: the ads are more than 20 years old – social media and smart phones have revolutionized how audiences look at print advertising. “We used to think that we could instruct people step-by-step how to read an ad,” Morse said. “Look at the picture and headline, then read the words set in white block below it, then have the ‘a-ha moment’ in the tagline. You don’t see much of that anymore. Our eyes are trained to scroll, so full-bleed, bold visuals with a simple headline and minimal, if any, copy is the only way to attract eyeballs.” That said, Morse identified the following problems which ad designers must still avoid today:

Failing the “at-a-glance” test: Readers page through newspapers and magazines fairly quickly, so an ad only has a second or two to grab your attention. Consequently, it has to give you some idea of what it’s about in just a glance. All four of these ads fail that test miserably – there is absolutely nothing in any of the imagery or headlines that signals these are about smoking.

“The conventional wisdom in advertising used to be ‘never see and say.’ It wasn’t considered creative,” Morse said. “But audiences today want directness, transparency, and authenticity. Why isn’t there a pack of cigarettes on that counter instead of a bowl of fruit?” Whether you’re designing print ads, brochures or even web pages, Morse added this advice: “Think about the advertising that catches your eye when you walk through an airport. They know you’re not going to stop and read because you have to get to your gate. So these days, you’re not making print ads anymore. You’re making posters.”

Ambiguous or confusing headlines: If a headline should make you want to read more, all of these ads fail at that level, too. The headline, “What else is within your kids’ reach?” could have worked, Morse said, “but only if the ad had showed something that immediately conjures up danger.” As it stands, who could fault a parent for reading the headline and thinking, “So my kid can reach fruit – that’s a problem?”

Morse was similarly nonplussed by the ad with the headline “Double Trouble.””Does this mean the two kids are demon seeds?” she wondered. “That’s what I see. I think they want to convey that they are bored, but it’s the image itself that’s boring. Think of how much more effective it would have been if we had been eye-to-eye with those kids, instead of clear across the room from them.”

Trapped space: This design flaw is present in all four ads, but it’s most problematic in the one featuring the image of a basketball court. The pole supporting the backboard and hoop creates one visual boundary on the left side of the ad, and the two yellow blocks of text create another boundary on the right. The area in between is trapped space: empty and devoid of visual interest. And while this might seem counterintuitive, it’s probably the first thing you looked at. “Your eye goes straight to where there is nothing,” Morse said, and the next step is often to turn the page – the rest of the ad goes unread.

Terrible tagline: Morse, who is a voracious reader and appreciates a well-turned phrase, was particularly annoyed by the campaign’s tagline, It’s within your reach to keep cigarettes out of theirs. “It feels utterly manufactured – you can almost hear the ad team coming up with it. Successful taglines today feel intuitive, conversational – they capture the voice inside the audience’s head.”

Other problems: “It’s shaming, which is another way of saying it’s a one-way conversation. That kind of command-and-control marketing doesn’t work anymore. And it’s not straightforward. It has a weird circularity to it. It’s within your reach to keep cigarettes out of their reach so they won’t reach for them, etc., etc. And doesn’t ending a sentence with the words ‘theirs’ look like it’s a mistake? By the time you get there, your brain thinks, ‘What’s theirs?'”

Buried ask: Ultimately, these ads are asking adults to avoid leaving cigarettes around where teenagers can find them. The ask is not in any of the headlines, and if you read the tagline closely, it is only informing adults that they have the power to make cigarettes less available, but there is no explicit call to action. For that, you have to go deeper into the body copy to find the words, “put…cigarettes where kids can’t get them.”

“Don’t leave your call to action to the tagline,” says Morse. “Make it clear in the headline. And don’t make it an order. Make sure your audiences feels that you know what they’re up against. Be shoulder to shoulder with them. Tell them, ‘Let’s do this together, because we’re in this together.'”

Update: Philip Morris’s current ‘anti-smoking’ work is a program called “Unsmoke the World.” This program was launched in 2019 along side an announcement that they were committed to being smoke free. Below are a couple of images currently on www.unsmokeyourworld.com. You can judge for yourself if Morse’s assessment of their ads from 2017 rings true for Philip Morris in 2023.

Starting Your Story Strong: What I Learned from Improv

Who doesn’t love a fresh start? Whether it’s a new year, a new project, or a brand new day planner just waiting to be cracked open, people love a clean slate. Unless, that is, you’re a writer, and that clean slate is a blank computer screen with a blinking cursor that is impatiently waiting for you to write something…anything. As Deneen L. Brown writes in the book Telling True Stories, “The hardest thing about the beginning is the blank screen.”

Beginnings are intimidating because we know how crucial they are to the success of a story. In an age of ever-shrinking attention spans, if we don’t grab the audience’s attention right away, they will tune out or scroll to something else. That kind of pressure can inhibit your creativity, so it helps to have tools to rely on when the cursor keeps blinking but your muse isn’t talking. And the tools I consistently rely on come from improv.

At its essence, improv is telling stories, and for the actors, the empty stage and the absence of a script are the moral equivalent of a blank screen. In studying improv at the Groundlings Theatre, Upright Citizens Brigade and Impro Theatre, I’ve learned an important lesson about getting a story started: once you have the who, what, and where in place, the story will begin to write itself.

Who: Who is the audience going to care about, connect with, and follow on their journey? Giving this person a name and describing them so we can begin to picture them in our mind’s eye is essential, but that alone won’t be enough to keep the audience reading. You need the audience to care about the protagonist in your story right away.

Storytellers accomplish this by creating scenes in which the main character does something that is universally recognizable as likeable or even heroic. The legendary screenwriter Paddy Chayevsky dubbed these “pet the dog” scenes. (Or for you cat lovers, check out Blake Snyder’s book, Save the Cat.) The possibilities are endless, but whatever you choose, make sure you show the main character exemplifying a strength, a value or some behavior that will generate an emotional connection to the audience.

What: What is happening? Why are we seeing this person on this day? What is the situation they are in? Let’s start to get an idea about what they want – so the audience can wonder what will happen next (which is the secret to them continuing to pay attention). A great way to get right to the what is by starting in the middle of the action.

As Deneen L. Brown writes later in her essay, “I often begin with the tensest moment I’ve encountered in my reporting. I start the story on a pinpoint but then spread out.” So, rather than starting from neutral territory (where everyone is calm and happy) and then waiting for something big to happen, start when the big thing has just happened. Then your audience is piecing together the who and where of the story as they breathlessly follow the action.

To test whether this works for your story, lay out the sequence of events and identify the moment of highest tension. Then dive right into describing that moment for your protagonist. You might find that the middle of the action is the perfect place to begin.

Where: Nothing fancy here. Where are we? The audience won’t be able to connect to the story until you can set them in a specific time and place. A few well-chosen details can create a world to welcome your reader to. You want the audience to be able to picture themselves in the room with your character(s) and decide to stick around.

In a recent Goodman Center storytelling webinar, one of our students, Josh Taylor from Wordplay Connects wrote a compelling story to illustrate how his organization can turn young people in the Potomac Highlands region into lifelong readers. Taylor started his story this way:

Dexter crosses the threshold of the bookstore, the jingle of its doorbells rattling behind him. As his mother greets the owners cheerily and tugs on his reluctant arm, Dexter warily sizes up the rows of bookshelves which tower over him. He idly stands by as the adults discuss their goings-on, then his face flushes bright red as he realizes they’re talking about him.

In just three sentences, we know who the story is about, where we are, what is happening… and we’re left with that important sensation of wondering why people are talking about Dexter.

In improv, we practice creating the who, what and where in three lines – or less! This is a great exercise for both getting unstuck but also starting your story in a way sure to grab the audience’s attention. Because as Lisa Cron reminds us in her book, Wired for Story, “From the very first sentence, the reader must want to know what happens next.”

ICYMI: What Stories Can Learn from Jokes

This article is from the December 2012 edition of our newsletter “Free-Range Thinking.” 

The next time somebody says, “Three guys go into a bar,” pay attention. There’s a lesson in storytelling behind the laugh.

Barnet Kellman

The next time somebody says, “Three guys go into a bar,” pay attention. There’s a lesson in storytelling behind the laugh. Barnet Kellman is an Emmy Award winning director best known for helming over 70 episodes of the hit series “Murphy Brown.” He currently teaches a course entitled “Foundations of Comedy” at USC’s School of Cinematic Arts, but it was back in 2008, when he was teaching a class on directing that he hit upon an offbeat way to teach his students the fundamentals of storytelling. He made them tell jokes.

“I gave them an assignment before the first class,” Kellman told me when we spoke by phone last week. “They had to bring a joke and be prepared to tell it.” There was one condition: it couldn’t be a knock-knock joke or a riddle. The students did their homework, the jokes told in class ran the gamut from hilarious to weird to just plain dumb, and by the end of the exercise, Kellman had made his point.

“Making them tell jokes gave them an obligation,” Kellman said, putting extra emphasis on the last word. “They had to keep people’s interest and get a laugh at the end.” In fact, Kellman asserts that joke-tellers have no fewer than five obligations to their audience if they are going to earn a good laugh. As Kellman outlined these obligations, I could easily see the parallels to telling a good story:

1. Quickly grab attention. Jokes, stories, newscasts, commercials – all forms of communication have this initial obligation because we live in an age of ADD. Kellman said that good joke-tellers instinctively start with the same word – “So…” – because it’s the fastest way to meet this first obligation. “Anything else is warming yourself up and wasting time,” he added. “You can’t wander. You’ll lose your audience.”

2. Create interest through incident and/or identification with character. A joke, like a story, is an invitation to temporarily leave the real world behind and teleport instantly to another time and place. Most people are happy to take this leap, but they need a little help first. They need characters with whom they can identify or a familiar scene they can enter. When a joke-teller says, “Three guys go into a bar…” he’s meeting this second obligation with just six words. As an illustration for his directing class, Kellman used a joke that begins with precisely this set-up. Before you go any further, go to this jokes page and scroll about two-thirds down the page to read the full text.

3. Build tension through complication, elaboration and misdirection. Laughter is literally the body’s way of releasing tension, so it stands to reason that the more tension a joke-teller can build up, the bigger the laugh. Note how the joke about the three men in a bar presents a pattern of behavior (i.e., tossing bottles in the air and shooting them) that builds into a bizarre battle of one-upmanship. Stories build tension in similar ways, giving the audience just enough information so they understand what’s happening but are curious to see what happens next.

Photo courtesy of callmefred.com

4. Make “the turn” (i.e., a sudden change in attention or subject). “A joke is really two stories,” said Kellman in explaining the fourth obligation. “The set-up gets us following one story, but we ultimately end up in another.” The bottle-shooting contest seems to be a story about a macho display of hometown pride until the third man (from Boulder) shoots the other two. The stories you tell may never feature such a dramatic turn of events, but they do require some element of surprise. “You keep people interested by not letting them know exactly where you’re going,” said Kellman.

5. Deliver the punchline. Like stories, jokes are intended to convey meaning, and that’s what the punchline is all about. After all the elaboration, complication and misdirection, the punchline reveals the true meaning of the story: the Boulderite in the bar isn’t a cold-blooded murderer. He’s just an ardent believer in recycling! “The laugh at the end proves you’ve successfully conveyed your meaning,” said Kellman. “It’s a verdict you can’t hide from.” Storytellers don’t have to deliver punchlines, but their tales must convey meaning – the final, and perhaps most important obligation of all.

After 24 Years Helping Good Causes Tell Better Stories, Andy’s 5 Parting Requests

When I began this work in 1998, gas was $1.07 per gallon. The world’s most popular mobile phone was made by Nokia. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation did not exist. Also absent from the public interest sector was significant interest in the craft of storytelling. Whenever I would talk to prospective clients about improving their narrative skills, reactions ranged from disinterest to mild disdain. Get serious, many told me. One doesn’t change the world with a bunch of anecdotes.

Twenty-four years later, I can report that attitudes have changed dramatically. It’s hard to find a public interest organization today that isn’t telling stories or talking about ways to “change the narrative.” That said, I cannot report that all the stories I’m seeing are well-told or are the best kinds of stories to tell. Even more troubling are the stories told in ways that do more harm than good. So, for this month’s edition of free-range thinking – the last I’ll author – I have five requests for those who still aspire to tell truly world-changing stories.   

First, be clear on the kinds of stories you’re telling and what you expect them to accomplish. In the public interest sector, most stories tend to fall into one of two categories: journalistic stories or dramatic narrative.

Journalistic stories are designed to provide everything the audience needs to know within the first few paragraphs, answering the essential who, what, when, where, why and how questions that define “news.” The remaining paragraphs fill in the story’s details in descending order of importance. The overarching purpose of this format is to inform quickly and concisely, and there is a built-in understanding that the audience does not have to stay for the entire story to glean the main points.

Dramatic narrative, in contrast, is designed to engage the audience emotionally, which can motivate them to take a specific action. These stories tend to focus on an individual or small group with whom the audience can closely identify. The narrative usually follows the three-act structure (or what is commonly referred to as a beginning, middle and end), and the audience must follow the entire story to learn what happens and, most importantly, understand why this journey was worth their time and attention.

One of the most common problems I’ve observed over the years occurs when organizations confuse the kind of story they’re telling with the intended outcome. Simply put: If your goal is to spread awareness, the journalistic model is fine. But if you want your audience to actually do something – to sign, to march, to give – then you need dramatic narrative. Emotions are the precursors to actions, and journalistic storytelling simply isn’t designed to provoke emotional engagement.

Second, it’s time to move beyond the “broken person model” of storytelling. Also known as “deficit-based” framing, these stories introduce us to an individual at a crisis point (if not the lowest point) in their life. They are unhoused, unemployed, food insecure, a victim of domestic violence, addicted to drugs, or any combination of such dire circumstances. Through some means (often unspecified, which is another problem), they come into contact with our organization, and thanks to a specific program or initiative, they emerge a “fixed” person with a better life trajectory. (You can read more about problems caused by deficit framing in our March 2022 blog post.)

This storytelling model can evoke pity, but what you really want is empathy. Writing in Psychology Today in 2015, Dr. Neel Burton explained the key difference between pity and empathy: “Pity is a feeling of discomfort at the distress of one or more sentient beings and often has paternalistic or condescending overtones. Implicit in the notion of pity is that its object does not deserve its plight, and, moreover, is unable to prevent, reverse, or overturn it. Pity is less engaged than empathy, sympathy, or compassion, amounting to little more than a conscious acknowledgment of the plight of its object.”

The antidote to this common problem is, as you might guess, asset-based framing. Trabian Shorters, a thought-leader on this form of storytelling, calls it “a narrative model that defines people by their assets and aspirations before noting the challenges and deficits.” Or as we like to say at The Goodman Center, let your audience meet a person before they see a label. (Read more on asset-based framing in our March 2022 and May 2022 blog posts.)

Third, please stop calling everything a story. I cannot count the number of websites I’ve visited that present client testimonials but label them stories. There is no denying that testimonials have value – putting a human face on your proof of concept is always better than numbers alone. But a quote from a client thanking the organization for turning their life around rarely has the same impact as a full-fledged story in which we can see (and feel) for ourselves how that life was transformed. (The same can be said of most case studies, organizational histories, and donor profiles, which all have the potential to be powerful stories but are usually presented without the key elements.)

Fourth, even elite athletes have coaches and trainers, so…. If you want to enhance your storytelling skills and avoid the problems noted above, don’t be reluctant to ask for help, and I hope your first call will always be to The Goodman Center.

Our new Director, Kirsten Farrell, has storytelling in her DNA. As a member of the nationally recognized Impro Theatre, she is part of a company that crafts long-form improvisational plays, literally creating 90-minute stories on the fly in front of live audiences. You simply cannot do that unless you know the rules of storytelling inside and out (and also know how those rules can be bent or even occasionally broken and still delight an audience.)

As an advisory team member for The Corporation for Supportive Housing’s “Speak Up! Program LA,” Kirsten trains people with lived experience of homelessness to tell their stories. And since joining The Goodman Center in 2021, she has facilitated dozens of in-person and online workshops helping public interest organizations across the U.S. and around the globe hone their storytelling skills. I am honored and thrilled that she will be continuing the work I started back when I was filling up my car’s tank for $10 and making calls on my very cool Nokia flip-phone.

Fifth and last, never lose faith in the power of your stories. They are, always have been, and always will be the essential currency of human communication. Which is why I will end my last newsletter with the same words we use to end every storytelling class we offer:

Numbers numb, jargon jars, and nobody ever marched on Washington because of a pie chart. Stories, by their very nature, tend to get stored in our brains. So, if you can change the story inside someone’s head, you’ve taken the first step to changing the world.

Lessons Learned from a Decade of Story Collecting

In 2012 the YMCA of Rye, New York launched a story-collecting project to capture the personal experiences of its members, staff, and volunteers. Modeled loosely on StoryCorps, a national oral history nonprofit, “The Rye Story Project” has collected over 450 stories since then and has regularly shared them in on-site exhibits, marketing materials, annual reports, and social media.

When we first interviewed Lisa Tidball, Communications Director, and Denise Woodin, Director of Community Impact and Social Responsibility, in November 2013, they told us that capturing and sharing these stories helped build community, added a more personal touch to marketing materials, and supported the Rye Y’s fundraising efforts. With the project marking its 10th anniversary this month, we thought it would be a good time to reconnect with Lisa and Denise and find out what lessons they have learned with a decade of story collecting behind them.

Kirsten Farrell: I have a hunch there are plenty of lessons learned after ten years of collecting stories, but does one rise above all the others?

Denise Woodin: I think it’s that everyone has a story. While it may not be an earth-shattering “The Y Saved My Life” story – although we do get those – a lot of the stories are just “I bring my kids here for swim lessons and they love it,” or “This is just such a great place for our family to come and spend family time,” or a senior citizen telling us, “This is how I get out of the house. This is how I make social connections.” Sometimes those are the best stories.

Kirsten: Has the process changed over the years? Have you found some things that were more helpful in gathering or telling stories?

Denise Woodin and Lisa Tidball

Denise: For the most part, we hit on a formula right away that worked. One change is that a lot of interviewers, including myself, started out by recording people’s stories on a legal pad, writing them down. Now most of us are recording them on our phones, and it makes it a lot easier to transcribe them.

Lisa Tidball: I much prefer that because I can really focus on the person I’m talking to. Also, we always tell the story in first person. We started that out in the beginning, and that’s one of the things we ask our interviewers to do.

Denise: If you’re transcribing the person in their own words, it’s in their voice. It makes it fresher, more immediate. Most of the people that we use as interviewers are not writers. So, it’s easier for them to transcribe the story. Then they send it to me, and I go through and I edit. I edit very lightly. I take out the “ums”, I take out the repetitive things, but I try and keep it in the interviewee’s voice.

Lisa: We also send every story to the person we interviewed for their approval, so that they can feel comfortable with it.

Kirsten: Given that many of the interviewers are not professional journalists or necessarily storytellers, do you provide other guidelines to help them gather these stories?

Denise: We give them a tip sheet, and we try to do a 20-minute training every year. We give them a list of questions but we say, “Glance at this before the interview, but never look at it while you’re interviewing the person.” We want you to have a conversation with this person. Pretend it’s someone you’ve met at a cocktail party and you’re genuinely curious about them. How long have they been a member? Does their family come here? What are some of their goals? What are some of their challenges?

Lisa: And let the interviewee lead it. Let it take the form that they want.

Kirsten: You told us in 2013 that you regularly use the stories and in several different ways. How are you using them now, ten years in?

Lisa: Denise will read a story often before a board meeting, and it keeps the board members connected. We’ll put some stories in social media. We’ll put them in our annual report. We’ll use them throughout the year to remind people of who we are, the people who are benefiting from the Rye Y, and then we have our on site exhibit for people who are just coming to the Y, they’re bringing their child to swim, or they’re getting on the treadmill, and they may not be aware of all the important work we do.

On-site display of stories

Kirsten: I can imagine that it makes people feel so good if they work there, but also anyone who is in that space. Even if you’re just going to do some laps. Reading these stories must make people think, “I like being here in this space that provides so much to so many people.”

Lisa: Yes, and if you’re just having a hard time dragging yourself to a class, and then you read this amazing story about a person who came to the Y through all these different challenges, it’s helpful.

Denise: It’s great for staff morale too, because over and over again we hear people say what they love about coming here is the friendliness of the staff, the helpfulness of the staff, and they name them. So, if we put that in the story – “Caitlin and Rich greet us at the front desk and they know our names” that’s a great boost for our staff.

You can read examples from The Rye Y Story Project here and also access the interview tips they use, their permission form, and the PowerPoint they have used in the past to help spread this storytelling project to other organizations.